Firstline

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 41 total)
1 2 3
  • Replies
  • Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by bizzarroView
    I can’t either

    Fixed. Why no one makes me notice?

    Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by SilabolinView
    In a couple of fitness magazines.
    And they kind of bullied the "old" doctors, with education from the 60s, stil saying eggs are bad for cholestrol.

    I eat eggs on a daily basis and loads of butter, sometimes a whole stick. My total cholesterol is 150, HDL 60, LDL-C 70. I have been above therapeutic TRT ranges since April. It was 220 in July but I have dropped AI since and that normalized my lipids.

    Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by PT1982View
    You should get comparable sides like with tren A eventually. But then again, I’ve ran E before with no terrible sides. I like the 200mg dose weekly you’re using because many people don’t understand that its 5x as anabolic and androgenic as test. That equates to a gram of test! Of course results is going to be vastly different, but the body will register it the same. I’ve ran absolute ridiculous amounts of tren. Doses so high that I’d be ashamed to openly admit. And I can get similar results at a fraction of what I’ve ran. I love running it at 25-37.5mgs daily. I rarely use it anymore, but that’s about the dose I’ll use these days. I do enjoy 100mgs weekly as a trt add on though. You’ll just want to stay on top of bloodwork! I don’t think I’ll ever use it over 50mgs daily again. I feel there is just no need.

    That was my actual goal, as an augment while on low end TRT. But, I’m already using more than planned and was expecting the same sides (especially, heat, I like that) I had from 100mg A. I’ll try another brand…

    Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by Marcus GView
    That’s unfortunate have you been see doctor about the elevates prolactin? If so what did he say…

    Well I already had a pituitary MRI done back in 2014 unveiling a small adenoma, but prolactin at the time was normal, hence was regarded as non secreting, non expanding as I had it repeated one year later and obv also checked all of pituitary hormones, no anomaly there. That excluded, an endo would just repute the elevation as idiopathic, actually I want to see one to see if I might get caber prescribed, but it’s unlikely he/she will in the absence of a prolactinoma (the Italian in me might make it appear as it is though…).

    Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by SilabolinView
    Yes, agree from my studies. Have du nazidrop all kind of sugars in my SBC. Im not sure of the fruitsjuice. Some of them (pomegranate f.i.) are said to be good for overall cardiovascular system but they are very high in glycemic index. So im not sure about the fruitjuices…

    Fruits are great but juices deprived of fiber not so much. Excessive loads of fructose are an health hazard.

    Firstline
    Member
    Talking about sides, I’ve started at 0.25 2x week and I’m getting light headaches and minor orthostatic hypotension. I also find it easier to fall asleep but it’s a benefit for me. After a couple weeks I might try 1mg/week as well, then taper before discontinuing.
    Firstline
    Member
    I can’t neither, to me they are subhuman scumbags.
    Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by saucerkingView
    What exactly is test suspension and what benefit does it carry over other Test?

    If TE is giving you depressive sides any shorter acting ester (ie. propionate ) or test suspension is likely to make those several times worse.

    Firstline
    Member
    I wonder how he will fare on DA given he’s on antagonists, lol
    Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by ObspowerstrokeView
    I would probably blow my brains out if I cheated on my significant other.

    So cute…

    Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by renepjdView
    The over-whelming majority of people should never need over that amount. Simply uneccessary unless a contest is pending.

    Not commenting about ppl competing, I don’t know anything about that, but I just don’t understand why amateur users would withstand nasty sides (even psych) from high dosages.

    BTW, to anyone here that has done both A and E, how much of the latter would compare in feeling to 100-150 mg of A?

    I’m four weeks in 200mg Tren E and not feeling anywhere like 100mg A. Maybe just grossly underdosed? It’s so weak I won’t be surprised if I’m doing deca and not Tren. I’ve been rather unlucky with gear lately.

    Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by Marcus GView
    How long have you been cycling 19nors?

    I made a short run of Tren back in Oct/Nov, had to quit because of elevated liver enzymes, I was taking lot of ibuprofen because of gingival inflammation, apparently progestins can upregulate some cytokines released in the process, I already had a daft tooth and Tren acted like fuel on fire; had to pull it.

    So duh, make sure your teeth and gums are healthy before jumping on 19-nors lol.

    Prolactin was already elevated before the Tren, went on Caber, so I told myself "this might be the right moment" and enjoyed a good run of Tren. It was real fun.

    Eventually I dropped caber and now it’s elevated again.

    Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by DreamerView
    Found the path to the answer. Andro receptors are not all the same. True Andro receptors in sex tissue and such actually react to testosterone at a much greater strength than non-True receptors. (True ad non-true are just terms I made up to make the point without all the scientific gab.) In the True Recptors Testosterone acts at a three times stronger binding afinity than other substances (We will use Tren as an other substance). So one key for this lock only. In non-True Andro receptors (Fat etc) it is open market to what binds (Many keys one lock) and Tren will beat Test if it is available.

    The body is a frigging incredible thing.

    I was given with much certainty that the True receptors will not accept anything but Testosterone. Testosterone Analogues need not apply. So in the end THIS is why Testosteron is an absolute must for cycle.

    I believe you refer to 5-AR dependent tissue.

    Trenbolone is also regarded as a SARM since it diplays poor affinity for tissues such as skin, hair, prostate, where DHT plays a major role.

    Testosterone literally spoils my hair, but Tren doesn’t affect it one bit.

    I used to have abs straight and fine hair and this is the current status after three years on TRT:

    As for binding I agree with Doc that SHRonin will render T practically unusable.

    Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by numbereView
    I’ll definitely get some as a just in case, but I’ll hold off taking it unless I start having issues.

    Well thought.

    Firstline
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by ObspowerstrokeView
    Lol I know man!

    Some issues from endocrine imH10s might reveal themselves in non-suspicious times, just saying.

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 41 total)
1 2 3