Deca vs EQ question

They both serve their own (different purposes) but if you could only have one then Deca destroys EQ hands down. Deca is an excellent stand alone compound, and EQ is a very mediocre filler compound.

MG per MG Nandrolone destroys Boldernone. Now dihydroboldernone… different story. Not to mention Deca makes your joints feel goooood

deca and EQ shouldn’t even be compared to each other.. they are opposites and in totally different classes of steroids . for some reason guys seem to think they are comparable but they are not. Eq is a test derived anabolic (its simply non alkalated Dbol ), where as Deca is a 19nor progestin derived anabolic

for guys that say Deca just makes you hold water and you lose your gains afterwards, totally BS . these guys are running too much test on their deca cycles and thats why they say this, its the test not the deca.

deca by itself is a PURE Anabolic. its main job is just to simply up regulate protein synthesis as well as blood volume. it does not convert to estrogen nor cause a bunch of water retention and bloat in and of itself. it just builds muscle, hands down. IF you do get bloat from a deca only cycle (without test) its because your sensitive to progestin and thats causing you to be estrogen sensitive (which is fine, that can actually help you put on more muscle)

because Deca is a progestin and makes estrogen work more "powerfully" essentially, its going to build more size and mass then EQ , because EQ can have anti estrogen effects. Deca is also more anabolic then EQ.
EQ is more ‘dry’ in that it does not have estrogenic effects like Deca. which is why some guys may thing EQ gains are more ‘clean’ , but again the estrogenic effects are going to help you build more overall muscle.

the similarities.. well both EQ and Deca are mainly anabolics (ie, not displaying much androgenic activity). Deca is less androgenic though and as such is better suited for use by women then Eq. both will help increase blood volume, which results in some weight gain and over a length of time more vascularity and muscle fullness (so I consider both "volumizers"). both have effects on the joints and help strengthen tendons.

personally I use EQ as a ‘filler’ drug, or to cruise on, or to add in to a volumizing phase of a cycle . Deca on the other hand I use as a anabolic and as a stand alone ‘work horse’ compound to help put on size and keepable muscle.

if I could only have one or the other .. Deca hands down

Originally Posted by MaxBoss

What’s the reasoning behind injecting horses with EQ and not deca?

EQ, Deca , Winstrol .. they are all used in veterinary medicine. and its not just horses. cattle, sheep, etc. EQ is just the most heard of just because it does not have a medical use in humans , but still deca and winny are used in vet medicine just as well as EQ.
even cats and dogs may receive injections of deca, depending on their condition.

most the time these are used on sick animals or to help an animal heal and retain muscle and bone mass post surgery or post injury.

note – and as we all know , Tren and Estrogen injections are also used. this is mainly to help animals put on mass and increase feed efficiency (tren does not bulk the animals up very well without high dosages of estrogen with it though, thats why they use both together)

Originally Posted by OldBoy

note – one of the best places to learn about steroids is NOT from the stupid ‘bro’ steroid profiles you see online .. its to dig deep and study veterinary medicine . lots of good info on steroid use in vet medicine .

heck even ‘sources’ to purchase quality AAS . look at buying vet medicine if you can . people will say well thats not human grade.. umm well its likely better then human grade. Horses for example have very weak immune systems compared to humans, one bad dirty injection can kill them. you own a 100k race horse, believe me your not going to be wanting to inject it with dirty EQ. so most veterinary grade AAS is super clean and high quality

If I owned cattle, I would certainly be pumping those bad boys to the max with test, deca and eq to get the most meat possible. Then when you eat them you’re getting some good gear in your meat… I’ve been able to find the large bottles of pfizer equipoise here in south america at a livestock veterinarian for around $700 for 50ml at 250mg which is more expensive than I would like to be paying. Maybe it would be a better idea to buy raw powders and make your own and experiment on some cows…

Originally Posted by MaxBoss

What’s the reasoning behind injecting horses with EQ and not deca?

EQ was "popularized" to the general public by track horse racing when jockeys got caught. It doesn’t mean that the horses weren’t receiving other compounds.