The most common complaint with Trenbolone is that it can reduce aerobic capacity possibly due to brondark_sideal dilation from increased prostaglandin formation. However at least in most users, since the blood levels of Trenbolone Enanthate won’t spike as rapidly or peak to as high of a level as quickly as we see with the Acetate version- this effect is not as pronounced with the Enanthate version. Thus the infamous “Tren Cough” many users complain about with the Acetate version isn’t as common with the Enanthate ester. That being said, if your gear is the Enanthate version, no need to worry about obliteration.
When it comes to comparing Trenbolone to Primobolan , the winner will obviously be determined by environmental criteria such as where you live and thus your level of access to the product as well as price of the gear. Here is why: Both Trenbolone and Primobolan will give you a nice-lean mass, whether you are on cutting or bulking cycle, without aromatizing. Given the chemical composition of both drugs, you will be able to burn fat as you build nice and hard muscle mass. However, I completely agree with Vullfromsc when it comes to ”strength” and ”dosage” issues. Anabolic /Androgenic ratio of Trenbolone is 500:500, where as it is only 88:44-57 for Primobolan. In a relatively long cycle (16+ weeks), 400-600 mg of Primobolan per week will nonetheless provide you the lean mass gain; however, on a dosage and price basis, Trenbolone is the winner (since not everyone lives in Turkey where every pharmacy carries Schering’s prescription-free Primobolan Depot for 5$ per amp, lol).
